What is love?
Based on that point 1 is true, when we are faced with a situation we can separate the elements that compose it. For example if we see a movie and say that we loved, it will be acting, direction , production , visual effects and sound, the story , the script, ie if we like all this then we could say "I love that film "or" I love that movie. " We prefer that people love ideas or, in some cases "I love my guitar", "love my computer ", etc.. Usually they say on ideas to "I love science , "" for love of the art "," love for life. " Then love is when a certain object is seen, and proseado, by our personality and are separate properties. Each property raises a feeling and the combination of these feelings produce love. You could say that the combination of properties, which are the object, is what awakens love.
Now if the point 1 of this analysis is not certain in any case we are reaching that love is generated by an object that has certain properties, and combinations thereof awaken to love, almost the same definition as above for more conceptions are different, but are based on the same.
One of the ideas that I want to quote about love is discovered by Friedrich Nietzsche. He believed that love was reached when trying to cover the well with a whole towards something and not get it, "an overflow into something unlimited" said the German philosopher. Then we spoke of these properties, the object that attracts us, we can not, even if we make the effort to try to cover our good as a whole. Moreover, Nietzsche says that when we love together all the best properties of things more wonderful and perfect that we consider in the world, and how are you are similar to the object is considered that marvelous thing, that something perfect.
These statements conclude that feelings deceive us, and they always have and I will demonstrate them later. And demonstrate that thanks to the reasoning it has been scientific progress and therefore also the man has progressed. And make progress on a philosophy of true love, perfect love.
Based on that point 1 is true, when we are faced with a situation we can separate the elements that compose it. For example if we see a movie and say that we loved, it will be acting, direction , production , visual effects and sound, the story , the script, ie if we like all this then we could say "I love that film "or" I love that movie. " We prefer that people love ideas or, in some cases "I love my guitar", "love my computer ", etc.. Usually they say on ideas to "I love science , "" for love of the art "," love for life. " Then love is when a certain object is seen, and proseado, by our personality and are separate properties. Each property raises a feeling and the combination of these feelings produce love. You could say that the combination of properties, which are the object, is what awakens love.
Now if the point 1 of this analysis is not certain in any case we are reaching that love is generated by an object that has certain properties, and combinations thereof awaken to love, almost the same definition as above for more conceptions are different, but are based on the same.
One of the ideas that I want to quote about love is discovered by Friedrich Nietzsche. He believed that love was reached when trying to cover the well with a whole towards something and not get it, "an overflow into something unlimited" said the German philosopher. Then we spoke of these properties, the object that attracts us, we can not, even if we make the effort to try to cover our good as a whole. Moreover, Nietzsche says that when we love together all the best properties of things more wonderful and perfect that we consider in the world, and how are you are similar to the object is considered that marvelous thing, that something perfect.
These statements conclude that feelings deceive us, and they always have and I will demonstrate them later. And demonstrate that thanks to the reasoning it has been scientific progress and therefore also the man has progressed. And make progress on a philosophy of true love, perfect love.
